Skip to content
PipsMorrow
INTERMEDIATE

Lesson 05 of 8 · Risk and Money Management

Drawdown and What It Does to an Account

22 min4 topics

Topic 1 of 4

By the end of this lesson

  • Calculate the gain required to recover a given drawdown
  • Distinguish a normal drawdown from a broken strategy
  • Set a drawdown limit that stops you before the arithmetic does

Before this lesson

A drawdown is the fall from a peak in your balance to the low that follows it. Every strategy has them, including good ones. What makes them dangerous is not their size but their arithmetic: recovering from a loss always takes a bigger gain than the loss itself, and the gap widens faster than intuition expects.

Recovery is not symmetric

Lose 50% and you need 100% to get back. This is not a trick of presentation. It is that the gain is calculated on the smaller balance that is left.

Recovery needed = drawdown / (1 - drawdown)

What each variable means:

  • drawdown — The fall from peak, as a decimal — 0.20 for 20%
Drawdown$10,000 becomesGain needed to recover
5%$9,5005.3%
10%$9,00011.1%
20%$8,00025.0%
30%$7,00042.9%
40%$6,00066.7%
50%$5,000100.0%
75%$2,500300.0%
90%$1,000900.0%

The first three rows are survivable and the last three are usually not — not because the money is unrecoverable in principle, but because the trading required to recover it is nothing like the trading that produced the edge. Needing 300% back is the point at which a disciplined trader starts taking undisciplined trades.

Caution

This is the arithmetic behind every rule in this track. Small consistent risk is not caution for its own sake; it is the only way to keep drawdowns inside the range where ordinary trading gets you out of them.

Expected drawdown from your own numbers

You do not have to wait to find out how deep your drawdowns go. Two inputs give a usable estimate: your risk per trade, and the longest losing streak your win rate will produce.

Streaks are longer than they feel

A 40% win rate means each trade has a 60% chance of losing. The chance of six in a row is 0.6 to the sixth power — about 4.7%. Over 200 trades, a run of six or more is not unlikely; it is close to certain.

Rounded; the point is the order of magnitude, not the exact count
Win rateStreak you should plan for in 200 trades
60%About 6 losses
50%About 8 losses
40%About 10 losses
30%About 14 losses

What that costs

At 2% risk per trade on $10,000, each loss is smaller than the last because the balance shrinks:

Losses in a rowBalanceDrawdownRecovery needed
5$9,0399.6%10.6%
10$8,17118.3%22.4%
15$7,38626.1%35.4%
20$6,67633.2%49.8%
30$5,45545.5%83.3%

Read that against the streak table. A 40% win-rate system at 2% risk should expect to visit a 20% drawdown, and the trader who has not decided in advance that this is normal will abandon a working method somewhere around loss eight.

Try it now

The drawdown calculator runs this for your own balance, risk and streak length, and reports the recovery each level requires.

Normal streak or broken edge

The hardest question in a drawdown is whether to keep going. Both answers are expensive when wrong: stopping a working system wastes the edge, and continuing a broken one empties the account.

Three questions separate them, and none is about how it feels.

  1. Is this drawdown outside what my statistics predict? Ten losses from a 40% system is expected. Twenty-five is not, and the difference is arithmetic rather than opinion.
  2. Did I follow the plan? A journal that shows the drawdown came from trades outside the rules is diagnosing the execution, not the edge.
  3. Did the conditions change? A trend system in a range, a news-driven regime, a spread that doubled after a broker change — all produce real drawdowns that no amount of persistence fixes.

If the answers are within expectation, yes, and no, the drawdown is the cost of the edge and the correct action is to keep trading the same way at the same fraction.

Note

Note that the honest version of question 2 requires a journal written before the outcomes were known. This is where Track 7 pays for itself: without a record, every drawdown is indistinguishable from a broken system, because memory rewrites the reasoning to match the result.

Setting a stop-trading level

Decide now, in the calm, what drawdown makes you stop. Written in advance it is a rule; invented at the time it is a panic.

  • A daily limit. Two or three losses, or 3% of the balance, and the day is over. This catches the specific failure of revenge trading, which does more damage per hour than anything else in this track.
  • A monthly limit. Around 6% to 10% for most retail plans. Reaching it means stopping until the next month, not sizing up to recover.
  • A strategy limit. A drawdown beyond what your statistics predict — say 1.5 times the worst in your sample — means going back to demo until you know which of the three questions above the answer was.

Then halve the size rather than stopping outright, if stopping entirely is unrealistic for you. A trader at half size in a drawdown is still gathering information, still executing, and doing half the damage — which is a far better outcome than a rule so strict it gets ignored.

Good to know

Write the levels down where you will see them at the moment they bind — the top of your journal, a note on the monitor. A limit you have to recall under pressure is a limit you will negotiate with.

Key takeaways

  • Recovery is drawdown / (1 − drawdown): 20% back needs 25%, 50% back needs 100%, 75% back needs 300%.
  • Estimate your own worst case from risk per trade and the losing streak your win rate implies — streaks are longer than they feel.
  • Separate a normal streak from a broken edge with statistics, the journal, and the conditions — not with how it feels.
  • Set daily, monthly and strategy drawdown limits in advance, and prefer halving size to a rule you will ignore.

Related articles